⚖️ ZeroTrace vs. Rubber Ducky
Is ZeroTrace the ultimate HID injection tool? Here’s a data-driven breakdown comparing it to the classic Hak5 Rubber Ducky, using real specs, features, and current documentation for both platforms.
🛠 Feature Breakdown
Feature | 🦆 Rubber Ducky | 🕵️ ZeroTrace |
---|---|---|
Device Type | HID Injection | HID & BLE Injection |
Web UI | ❌ No | ✅ Yes (cross-platform, real-time editing) |
Live Payload Editing | ❌ No | ✅ Yes (no reflash, edit/run instantly) |
Keystroke Injection Speed | ⚡ Fast (configurable) | ⚡ Fast (configurable) |
Scripting Language | Ducky Script | ZT Script |
WiFi Connectivity | ❌ No | ✅ Yes (AP, STA, easy setup) |
Bluetooth HID Mode | ❌ No | ✅ Yes (Automatic Switching) |
Remote Execution | ❌ No | ✅ Yes (Web UI, trigger from anywhere) |
Multi-Script Support | ❌ No (single script) | ✅ Yes (multi-payload, hot swap, file manager) |
Self-Destruct Mode | ❌ No | ✅ Yes (wipe storage instantly) |
HID Spoofing | ⚠️ Limited (keyboard only) | ✅ Yes (keyboard, mouse, mass-storage, printer) |
Mouse Automation | ❌ No | ✅ Yes (mouseMove, mouseDraw, mouseJitter, etc.) |
Brute Force Tools | ❌ No | ✅ Yes (PIN brute, password brute, config opts) |
Scripting Blocks/Conditions | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes (if/else, repeat, blocks, variables) |
Live Execution | ❌ No | ✅ Yes (real-time log in Web UI) |
Storage | Onboard, SD Card | Onboard (10mb) |
Price | 💰 $130+ | 💸 24,85€ (≈$27) |
📝 Ducky Script vs. ZT Script
ZeroTrace uses ZT Script: a modern, extensible scripting language with more features, structure, and clarity.
Example payload:
✅ ZT Script offers better readability, modular commands, variables, blocks, conditions, and supports advanced automation.
💡 Conclusion
ZeroTrace is the most advanced, cost-effective HID injection platform available—outpacing Rubber Ducky in every major category, from remote control and scripting to security, storage, and ease of use. Upgrade for next-level automation, research, and red teaming.